Weeks 1–3 · Structure
Claim, warrant and impact, one argument at a time.
Four programs of 6 to 12 weeks, worked on the topic the student is actually debating.
Most beginner cases assert three things and prove none of them. We work on the structure of a single argument until it's airtight — what you're claiming, why it follows, and why anyone should care — plus the common fallacies that get punished in a round.
Claim, warrant and impact, one argument at a time.
Finding the unsupported step in any argument.
Why it matters, and to whom.
Two contentions, written and defended.
Databases, journals and getting past headlines.
Which sources a judge will take seriously.
Accurate, in context, and defensible.
Organized so you can find things mid-round.
Evidence wins rounds and loses them. We cover searching past the first page of results, judging source quality, cutting cards without distorting the author, citing properly, and reading enough of a study to know whether it supports your claim at all.
Rebuttal is triage. We work on flowing so you know what was actually said, deciding which two arguments to spend your time on, weighing impacts explicitly for the judge, and asking cross-ex questions that build your next speech instead of scoring points.
Accurate notes under speed.
What to answer, and what to concede on purpose.
Questions with a purpose.
Telling the judge why you win.
Understandable first, fast second.
A judge who can follow you can vote for you.
Practical routines before a round.
Prep, pacing and bouncing back.
Content nobody can follow scores badly. We work on clarity before speed, on signposting so a judge can track you, on prep-time habits, and on the practical rhythm of a tournament — including losing a round and recovering for the next one.
Twenty minutes with the student and a parent on the topic and where rounds are being lost. Free.